Process descriptionThe present data refer to production on eight typical Danish Dairy farms in year, which combines dairy and (cash) crop production in a mixed farming system. The main characteristics of the eight farms are summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Main characteristics of the considered dairy farms.
A large part of the feed for the cattle is produced on the farm as a combination of silage and grain in a crop rotation with grass clover swards. Moreover, some of the farms with lower stocking rate produce grains, rapeseed or grain legumes as cash crops. Most cows are Holstein-Friesian of high genetic potential using artificial insemination (AI). Average yearly milk yields are around 7000 kg per cow in the farms. Most cows graze in 180 days per yearand thus needs conserved fodder for at least 185 days. Almost all the heifers are raised on the farm and grazed up to 200 days per year often on marginal land/permanent pasture. Bulls for fattening exist only on part of these farms mainly because of limitations on stocking rate. Most farms have stables with slatted floors (manure handled as slurry) and central milking parlors (rooms). All used water and effluents are collected in concrete slurry containers with a minimum capacity of 6 months (application to fields is only allowed from March to September). Cultivation of crops is often done using farmers own equipment while harvest of grains and silage is most often done by contractors. Equipment is usually modern and most processes automatic. There is most often one owner and a full time hired helper, who both have a diploma and are trained in farm management. Most farmers use modern feed planning methods and regular feed analyses to adjust protein levels and minerals and all follow public regulation concerning manure N utilization and fertilization. Data collection and treatmentData collection: All Danish farms are obliged to keep detailed records of purchases and sales for tax purposes and the yearly accounts are made with professional help. A representative set of these accounts, 2232, are reported by the advisors to the Danish Research Institute of Food Economics (DRIFE) and constitute the basic empirical input to the farm types presented here. Besides the economical data, information on the land use, livestock numbers and amounts produced are included in the data set by the advisors. Data from other sources are used to model the technical processes: Data from the advisory services (feeding and grazing practices), the Directorate for Food, Fisheries and Agri-business, Danish Environmental Protection Agency (pesticide use in different crops) and Statistic Denmark (countrywide use of fertilizer and concentrates, partition of land use on different crops and their total yields). The Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences (DIAS) together with DRIFE and Statistic Denmark is responsible for data collection. Data treatment: The data processing and details of the different farm types is the responsibility of DIAS and DRIFE. The DRIFE checks the account data and has divided the accounts according to the farm typology presented (link). These average data from each farm type has been used by DIAS to model a typical farm in terms of land use, herd size and production. All resource use, inputs, production and emissions is calculated using the farm level as the main unit and all the single enterprises have been described so that they fit coherently into the overall farm balances (e.g. crop production must fit the sum of homegrown feed used and exported). Thus, inputs of fertilizer, feeds and minerals are calculated to mach the livestock and cash crop production after correction for home grown feed (see also under validation (link)). The nutrient turnover on the farm is calculated by multiplying the physical turnover of inputs and products with N and P contents following standard procedures described by teori papir…..link). Emissions of ammonia, methane and nitrous oxide (N20) from the livestock, stables, manure storage and handling and from crop residues and soil are calculated using standard coefficients (IPCC, ref..?) on the amounts of nutrients and feed dry matter (DM). Direct energy use is determined by the use of a model that attaches diesel use to field operations following Dalgaard et al. 2000. Pesticide use on crop level is estimated from national statistical data of actually used amounts of each pesticide divided by number of standard approved dosages and acreage of the different crops (Danish Environmental Protection Agency) http://www.mst.dk/udgiv/publikationer/2001/87-7944-620-5/html/bred03.htm . Hvordan er emissioner fra pesticider beregnet? AfventerTechnical scopeThe Inventory includes all processes on the farm necessary for the cultivation and preservation of crops and home-produced fodder (e.g. soil preparation, sowing, fertilizing/manuring, plant protection, harvesting, making silage and transport of crops). Feeding and milking of cattle and calfs, feeding of other livestock and handling of bi-products such as manure and straw, use of electricity for milk cooling, ventilation and light is also included. To some of the processes are attached imports of e.g. feeds and fertilizers.
|
Soil type |
Loamy (clay) |
Sandy |
||||||
Stocking rate |
<1,4 |
1,4-2,3 |
>2,3 |
Organic farms |
<1,4 |
1,4-2,3 |
>2,3 |
Organic farms |
Number of accounts |
23 |
32 |
14 |
24 |
83 |
182 |
16 |
127 |
Pct of total Danish milk production |
4 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
15 |
43 |
4 |
9 |
What do the different types represent?
There are important differences between the dairy farm types. The farms on clay soils tend to feed more imported feeds and crop residues because cash cop production is relatively more competitive than on sandy soils. The sandy soil dairy farms usually include two-year grass-clover leys in the rotation. The farms with high stocking rate sell part of their manure production. Organic farms produce most feed themselves and use no pesticides, fertilizer or imported manure. The average size of organic farms is above the average size of farms in the conventional groups.
The farm type, Sandy with 1,4-2,3 LU per ha is considered the marginal farmthat is, the farm type most likely to expand production in the future, especially in a hypothetical situation of increased overall milk production as a consequence of increased demand in the food sector.
The representativity of the farm accounts has been checked using standard methodology at DRIFE. The resource use and production on the farms have been validated at two levels: Internal coherence within each farm type and overall coherence between the sum of farm types and national level input use and production.
On the farm level the quantification of each type has been validated primarily by checking the coherence between land use, crop yields and livestock production (e.g. the feed needed for the herd matches the home-produced feed plus imported feeds less sold cash crops and the sum of homegrown feeds and sold crops fits the land use).
At a higher hierarchical level the land use has been validated by comparing the sum of each crop acreage over all types with national statistics for the same year, e.g. checking that the total wheat area and total wheat yield does not differ more than a few % from the national statistics.
Likewise, the total estimated use of inputs like diesel, fertilizer and concentrated feeds across all farm types have been checked against statistical information on national level. In case of differences that could not be ascribed to an error in a specific type, a general correction factor was multiplied into all types for the relevant input item. For more details, see (link).
Inputs and outputs associated with production processes at eight different types of diary farms. Data are provided per farm per year?.
|
Soil type |
Loamy (clay) |
Sandy |
||||||
|
Stocking rate |
<1,4 |
1,4-2,3 |
>2,3 |
Organic farms |
<1,4 |
1,4-2,3 |
>2,3 |
Organic farms |
Products |
1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bread wheat |
ton |
76,3 |
17,2 |
34,0 |
26,7 |
36,7 |
12,1 |
8,4 |
8,3 |
Rape seed |
ton |
7,2 |
1,3 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
7,0 |
1,1 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
Grass seed |
ton |
0,7 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,8 |
0,7 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
Peas |
ton |
5,7 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
4,0 |
3,1 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
Potatoes |
ton |
11,3 |
0,0 |
6,3 |
2,2 |
11,8 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
Sugar beet |
ton |
13,6 |
7,0 |
239,0 |
18,0 |
17,1 |
0,0 |
44,9 |
0,0 |
Milk-ECM |
ton |
399,7 |
397,9 |
575,5 |
424,3 |
355,2 |
499,3 |
538,0 |
577,4 |
Grower pig (30 kg) |
ton |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
Beef meat |
ton |
25,1 |
15,4 |
20,3 |
16,3 |
19,9 |
20,6 |
23,9 |
17,8 |
Pork meat |
ton |
2,4 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
Manure |
ton |
0,0 |
0,0 |
2,6 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
2,0 |
0,0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials/fuels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spring barley |
ton |
0,0 |
88,8 |
217,2 |
104,2 |
9,4 |
113,0 |
224,0 |
152,9 |
Soy meal |
ton |
137,0 |
149,9 |
336,2 |
68,2 |
117,5 |
172,4 |
255,8 |
92,5 |
Lubricant Oil |
liter |
1106 |
634 |
720 |
798 |
843 |
769 |
704 |
882 |
Manure |
kg N |
440 |
0 |
0 |
853 |
615 |
0 |
0 |
1087 |
Fertilizer , Calcium ammonium nitrate |
kg N |
10290 |
3468 |
1363 |
0 |
8074 |
5308 |
2821 |
0 |
Fertilizer P |
kg P |
679 |
68 |
0 |
0 |
392 |
190 |
0 |
0 |
Fertilizer K |
kg K |
573 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
157 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
P, Mineral Feed |
kg P |
458 |
713 |
1697 |
446 |
407 |
831 |
1565 |
647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity/heat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity Denmark |
kWh |
37588 |
24416 |
36016 |
32062 |
28424 |
34310 |
37078 |
44277 |
Heating |
MJ |
449 |
767 |
47 |
164 |
499 |
568 |
424 |
448 |
Traction |
MJ |
389266 |
223012 |
253439 |
280943 |
296672 |
270798 |
247760 |
310509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emissions to air |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methane |
kg CH4 |
11256 |
10634 |
15286 |
11554 |
10364 |
14076 |
16012 |
15474 |
Ammonia |
kg NH3 |
2658 |
2485 |
3408 |
2435 |
2508 |
3203 |
3439 |
3333 |
N2O |
Kg N2O |
1069 |
669 |
657 |
759 |
968 |
970 |
834 |
1076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emissions to water |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrate |
kg NO3 |
39419 |
19112 |
19182 |
13436 |
36777 |
31881 |
26286 |
25308 |
Phosphate |
kg P |
1251 |
745 |
1160 |
2513 |
1065 |
1131 |
1602 |
3367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emissions to soil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carbon |
kg C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non material emissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arable land use |
ha
a |
99 |
50 |
44 |
88 |
81 |
65 |
48 |
99 |
Data URL:
http://www.lcafood.dk/database/processes/agriculture/diaryfarms.html
Version no.: 1.00
Authors: Niels Halberg, Danish Institute of Agricultural Science
and Per H. Nielsen
2.-0 LCA Consultants.
Data responsible: Randi Dalgaard and Niels Halberg, DIAS
Contact: niels.Halberg@agrsci.dk
Data entry: data have been entered into Simapro by Randi Dalgaard, DIAS and
transformed into this format by Per H. Nielsen, 2.-0 LCA Consultants
Data completed: ... 2003.
References.....
.....