Milk
(without quotas)
Milkproducts
are
produced at
dairies
from
milk produced
at dairy farms.
The marginal
farms cannot be determined based on experience as for other agricultural
products because the market has been regulated by quotas for many years
(Jensen and Andersen, 2003). However, based on Jensen and Andersen (2003)
it has been assumed that the marginal milk is
produced on sandy soils at farms with high livestock
density (Farm type 17 (50%)
and 18 (50%)). Furthermore, it has been assumed that
milk production determines the extent of cattle production and that
milk fat is still in excess
in the market and that cream is still converted into butter and exported
and sold cheap like today with quotas (see cattle
and butter).
The main
processes influenced by milk
demand are shown
in the figure below with full
milk
ex dairy
as example.
Figure
1: Market based product chain
diagram for full milk production covering the most important processes
in terms of contribution to global warming
in an envisioned scenario without milk quotas.
Boxes refer to production processes. Names of grey boxes refer
to the main product of the processes. Red arrows represent material
or energy transfer between two processes; green arrows represent saved
material or energy transfer as a result of displacements; green lines
represent displacements and red lines represent avoided displacements.
Further details can be found in the LCA
model. |
Dairy
cows at farm type 17 and 18 are producing the milk which used for full milk
production. For details about processes prior to the dairy see
milk ex farm.
Usage of milk from
farm and contributions to butter production is specific for specific
kinds of milk
due their different
fat contents
and
the
specific milk consumptions and contributions to butter
production have been determined for each category of milk based on fat
contents. See
table below.
|
Fat
content (%) |
Raw
milk1) consumption |
Cream2)
production |
Skimmed milk |
0.1 |
1.12 |
0.12 |
Low fat milk |
1.5 |
1.08 |
0.08 |
Full
milk |
3.5 |
1.02 |
0.02 |
Mini
milk |
0.5 |
1.11 |
0.11 |
1) 4.29% fat; 2) 38% fat.
|
The
potential
environmental impacts
associated with
milk demand ex dairy and ex retail are shown in the tables below. All
data are provided per kg
of milk product.
Skimmed milk
Impact category
|
Unit |
Ex dairy |
Ex
retail |
Conventional |
Organic |
Conventional |
Organic |
Global warming |
g CO2-eq. |
1200 |
|
1240 |
|
Acidification |
g SO2-eq. |
12 |
|
12 |
|
Nutrient enrichment |
g NO3-eq. |
58 |
|
58 |
|
Photochemical smog |
g ethene eq. |
0.34 |
|
0.42 |
|
Land use |
m2 year |
1.7 |
|
1.7 |
|
Location
in database: Materials/scenario
without milk quotas/food from industry/ and Materials/scenario without
milk quotas/food from supermarket/ |
Low fat milk
Impact category
|
Unit |
Ex dairy |
Ex
retail |
Conventional |
Organic |
Conventional |
Organic |
Global warming |
g CO2-eq. |
1150 |
|
1200 |
|
Acidification |
g SO2-eq. |
11 |
|
12 |
|
Nutrient enrichment |
g NO3-eq. |
56 |
|
56 |
|
Photochemical smog |
g ethene eq. |
0.33 |
|
0.42 |
|
Land use |
m2 year |
1.6 |
|
1.6 |
|
Location
in database: Materials/scenario
without milk quotas/food from industry/ and Materials/scenario without
milk quotas/food from supermarket/ |
Full milk
Impact category
|
Unit |
Ex dairy |
Ex
retail |
Conventional |
Organic |
Conventional |
Organic |
Global warming |
g CO2-eq. |
1090 |
|
1140 |
|
Acidification |
g SO2-eq. |
11 |
|
11 |
|
Nutrient enrichment |
g NO3-eq. |
53 |
|
53 |
|
Photochemical smog |
g ethene eq. |
0.31 |
|
0.40 |
|
Land use |
m2 year |
1.5 |
|
1.5 |
|
Location
in database: Materials/scenario
without milk quotas/food from industry/ and Materials/scenario without
milk quotas/food from supermarket/ |
Mini milk
Impact category
|
Unit |
Ex dairy |
Ex
retail |
Conventional |
Organic |
Conventional |
Organic |
Global warming |
g CO2-eq. |
2190 |
|
1230 |
|
Acidification |
g SO2-eq. |
12 |
|
12 |
|
Nutrient enrichment |
g NO3-eq. |
57 |
|
58 |
|
Photochemical smog |
g ethene eq. |
0.34 |
|
0.43 |
|
Land use |
m2 year |
1.6 |
|
1.6 |
|
|